


Next:Determination
of and
Up:Pileup
Measurements and Modelling
Previous:Simple
model of pileup
Pileup experiments and determination
of
and 
The experimental technique to measure
and
used
the High Energy X-ray Source (HEXS) at MIT's CCD Calibration Facility.
HEXS is the same source used for the ACIS quantum efficiency calibration,
so careful measurements of pileup using that source are particularly important
for the AXAF program. The HEXS source uses fluorescence from 12 different
targets ranging from Al to Ge as shown in Table 4.20.
The fluorescence spectrum is generated by the bremsstrahlung spectrum from
a commercial electron impact x-ray tube using a Mo target. The tube current
and voltage are independently adjustable and are temporally stable to within
one percent over relevant measurement periods. The maximum tube power is
9 W, with a maximum voltage of 30 kV.
Table 4.20: HEXS targets, energies, and x-ray penetration
depths.
| Target |
Energy |
X-ray mfp in Si |
| |
(eV) |
( m) |
| Al |
1487 |
8.0 |
| Si |
1740 |
12.4 |
| P |
2015 |
1.6 |
| Cl |
2622 |
3.1 |
| Ti |
4508 |
13.6 |
| V |
4949 |
17.7 |
| Fe |
6399 |
36.9 |
| Co |
6925 |
46.4 |
| Ni |
7471 |
57.8 |
| Cu |
8040 |
71.6 |
| Zn |
8630 |
88.0 |
| Ge |
9874 |
130.7 |
|
All detectors used for this analysis are flight-like ACIS CCDID-17s,
produced by MIT Lincoln Laboratories, which have a 1024 column by 1026
row array of 24
m
square pixels. As mentioned above, each CCD is divided into 4 readout quadrants
of 256x1026 pixels. Since the gain from each quadrant can be different,
most analysis is conducted on a quadrant basis rather than on the entire
CCD. Each CCD was flight qualified for ACIS although only w140c4r was selected
for the flight focal plane.
A series of 11 pileup measurements were conducted using various CCDs,
HEXS configurations, electronics and exposure times. The different configurations
are listed in Table 4.21 . For
each configuration, the CCD was exposed to x-rays from most of the 12 available
targets. For each target, a sequence of exposures was taken with 4 or 5
different x-ray fluxes generated by using different tube currents (the
tube voltage was held constant at 15 kV). The range of fluxes covered an
approximately even spread up to twice the nominal flux used during the
ACIS calibration.
Table 4.21: Pileup measurement configurations.
| CCD |
Date |
Electronics |
Exposure Time |
Comments |
| |
|
|
(secs) |
|
| w103c4 |
03jun96 |
Lbox |
7.22 |
Early HEXS configuration |
| w103c4 |
16jan97 |
Lbox |
7.22 |
|
| w103c4 |
12feb97 |
Lbox |
7.22 |
|
| w140c4r |
22jan97 |
DEA |
3.28 |
Back sided CCD |
| w163c3 |
27sep96 |
DEA |
3.28 |
|
| w190c3 |
26nov96 |
DEA |
3.28 |
|
| w203c2 |
07may97 |
DEA |
3.28 |
|
| w203c2 |
08may97 |
DEA |
7.15 |
Lbox exposure time |
| w203c4r |
16jan97 |
DEA |
3.28 |
|
| w210c3r |
12may97 |
DEA |
3.28 |
|
| w210c3r |
12may97 |
DEA |
7.15 |
Lbox exposure time |
|
An important assumption for the process is that the x-ray flux from
HEXS varies linearly with the x-ray tube current. This was checked two
different ways. First, the actual tube current was measurered using three
different current meters and compared to the front panel display. All agreed
within error. Secondly, the total electron charge detected by the CCD was
found to be linear with tube current. The total charge is a reliable quantity
since is does not depend on any event selection criteria. The data are
presented in the next subsection.



Next:Determination
of and
Up:Pileup
Measurements and Modelling
Previous:Simple
model of pileup
Please address comments and questions to Dr. John Nousek ( nousek@astro.psu.edu
)