


Next:Comments
on the Use
Up:Pile-up
Mitigation
Previous:Simulation
Results
A Recipe for Pile-up Mitigation?
These simulation results, while illustrative of the concept of masking
to improve piled-up spectra, do not provide a recipe for pile-up mitigation
that can be blindly followed. Pile-up effects clearly depend on the incident
spectrum, and no astrophysical spectrum looks like the lines we've simulated.
Furthermore, the quality metric we've used is not defined for a polychromatic
spectrum.
Nevertheless, an observer could use these results either to estimate
the masking a proposed observation will require or to roughly clean up
an actual observation. Assuming a point source on axis, the steps would
be:
-
From the observed event list, measure either the raw event rate, the g02346
event rate, or the raw event rate outside of a 1" circle centered
on the source. These quantities all serve as proxies for the incident photon
flux, which is unknown.
-
Using curves similar to those in Figure 6.45
find the O, Al, & Cu simulations that produced the same flux proxy
value.
-
For O, Al, & Cu, look up the exclusion radius that achieves the desired
quality level.
-
Use the largest of those radii to filter the events (i.e. assume all photons
from the source are at the ``worst'' of the three energies).
-
Adjust the AXAF effective area curve by the relative efficiency shown in
Figure 6.43-right. Obviously one would
want to compute the relative efficiency more accurately and at more energies
than was done here.
Figure 6.45: Flux proxies for seven
simulations






Next:Comments
on the Use
Up:Pile-up
Mitigation
Previous:Simulation
Results
Please address comments and questions to Dr. John Nousek ( nousek@astro.psu.edu
)