nextuppreviouscontents
Next:Predicted On-orbit Background Rates Up:Instrumental Background Previous:Background Rate Measurements at

  
Dependence of Background Rejection Efficiency on Event Grade Selection

An important consideration in choosing ACIS event selection criteria is the efficiency of background rejection. To illustrate this point, we present in Tables 4.72, 4.73 and  4.74, the fraction of background events in various grades. For conciseness, we list only the standard ASCA grades, and ACIS grade 255. A similar analysis should be performed (presumably by the AXAF Science Center) for all 255 ACIS grades before a final decision is made on the definition of standard ACIS grades. Of course, the raw XRCF background event lists we have compiled are available to ASC for this purpose.

A cursory analysis of these tables shows, for example, that in device I3 91.21% of background events were ACIS bit map grade 255 events (i.e. all eight neighboring pixels were above the split threshold). However, only 4.14% of the background events in S3 were ACIS grade 255 events. Thus, a large majority of the background events in a frontside device could be rejected simply by filtering ACIS grade 255 events, but only a very small percentage of the background events in a backside device would be rejected. If one were to reject only ACIS grade 255 events, the total on-orbit background rate for six devices should be $\rm\sim40\ ct\ s^{-1}$, which is about 22% of the telemetry bandwidth.
 
 

Table 4.72: Fraction of Background Events per Event Grade Measured at XRCF in the Passband 0.1-10 keV for Detectors I0, I1, I2, and I3
 
Flight Event$^{\dagger}$ Fraction of Events per Event Grade
Device Grades Quad A Quad B Quad C Quad D Mean
    (%)
I0 0 0.387 0.395 0.289 0.325 0.349
  1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
  2 0.139 0.146 0.133 0.121 0.134
  3 0.050 0.052 0.066 0.047 0.054
  4 0.064 0.057 0.076 0.063 0.065
  5 0.144 0.130 0.152 0.173 0.150
  6 0.159 0.120 0.166 0.236 0.170
  7 99.059 99.101 99.118 99.036 99.078
  157 99.202 99.231 99.270 99.209 99.228
  B255 93.677 88.740 89.959 91.731 91.027
I1 0 0.354 0.423 0.355 0.354 0.371
  1 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.000 0.001
  2 0.204 0.146 0.143 0.106 0.150
  3 0.094 0.146 0.069 0.087 0.099
  4 0.077 0.065 0.103 0.087 0.083
  5 0.160 0.173 0.197 0.143 0.168
  6 0.166 0.179 0.172 0.133 0.163
  7 98.945 98.868 98.956 99.090 98.965
  157 99.105 99.041 99.158 99.232 99.134
  B255 91.637 89.269 90.800 91.361 90.767
I2 0 0.343 0.280 0.273 0.230 0.282
  1 0.000 0.004 0.000 0.004 0.002
  2 0.124 0.068 0.104 0.121 0.104
  3 0.057 0.055 0.056 0.042 0.053
  4 0.033 0.093 0.048 0.079 0.063
  5 0.129 0.140 0.164 0.155 0.147
  6 0.114 0.157 0.130 0.113 0.129
  7 99.199 99.202 99.226 99.256 99.221
  157 99.327 99.346 99.390 99.415 99.370
  B255 94.400 90.730 90.750 93.887 92.441
I3 0 0.247 0.197 0.346 0.327 0.279
  1 0.009 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002
  2 0.085 0.081 0.059 0.163 0.097
  3 0.052 0.031 0.054 0.058 0.049
  4 0.019 0.063 0.069 0.062 0.053
  5 0.190 0.175 0.139 0.125 0.157
  6 0.166 0.103 0.129 0.192 0.148
  7 99.231 99.350 99.204 99.072 99.214
  157 99.430 99.524 99.342 99.197 99.373
  B255 90.273 90.925 90.304 91.679 90.795
$^{\dagger}$ All event grades except B255 are ASCA grades. Here B255 stands
for ACIS bit grade code 255 (i.e., all pixels above threshold).

 
Table 4.73: Fraction of Background Events per Event Grade Measured at XRCF in the Passband 0.1-10 keV for Detectors S0, S2, S4, and S5
 
Flight Event$^{\dagger}$ Fraction of Events per Event Grade
Device Grades Quad A Quad B Quad C Quad D Mean
    (%)
S0 0 0.195 0.230 0.307 0.263 0.249
  1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.001
  2 0.141 0.075 0.080 0.140 0.109
  3 0.060 0.027 0.043 0.053 0.045
  4 0.054 0.016 0.068 0.047 0.046
  5 0.124 0.166 0.141 0.169 0.150
  6 0.135 0.107 0.123 0.105 0.118
  7 99.291 99.379 99.239 99.218 99.282
  157 99.416 99.545 99.380 99.393 99.434
  B255 93.414 90.934 90.052 94.130 92.133
S2 0 0.393 0.298 0.338 0.354 0.346
  1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
  2 0.179 0.158 0.143 0.156 0.159
  3 0.089 0.084 0.065 0.049 0.072
  4 0.066 0.056 0.068 0.052 0.061
  5 0.241 0.152 0.182 0.192 0.192
  6 0.241 0.155 0.169 0.182 0.187
  7 98.790 99.096 99.034 99.015 98.984
  157 99.031 99.248 99.216 99.207 99.176
  B255 90.966 88.295 88.005 90.258 89.381
S4 0 0.345 0.323 0.411 0.393 0.368
  1 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.008 0.004
  2 0.161 0.232 0.166 0.283 0.210
  3 0.112 0.074 0.151 0.039 0.094
  4 0.032 0.066 0.094 0.063 0.064
  5 0.209 0.182 0.216 0.157 0.191
  6 0.145 0.190 0.144 0.283 0.190
  7 98.996 98.933 98.810 98.774 98.878
  157 99.205 99.115 99.034 98.939 99.073
  B255 92.890 89.010 85.648 89.456 89.251
S5 0 0.222 0.356 0.233 0.415 0.307
  1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.009 0.002
  2 0.189 0.144 0.141 0.189 0.166
  3 0.072 0.045 0.064 0.028 0.052
  4 0.026 0.083 0.064 0.113 0.072
  5 0.157 0.235 0.162 0.283 0.209
  6 0.091 0.144 0.141 0.217 0.148
  7 99.243 98.991 99.196 98.745 99.044
  157 99.400 99.227 99.358 99.038 99.255
  B255 92.820 88.693 87.609 92.604 90.432
$^{\dagger}$ All event grades except B255 are ASCA grades. Here B255 stands for ACIS bit grade code 255 (i.e., all pixels above threshold).

 
Table 4.74: Fraction of Background Events per Event Grade Measured at XRCF in the Passband 0.1-10 keV for Detectors S1 and S3
 
Flight Event$^{\dagger}$ Fraction of Events per Event Grade
Device Grades Quad A Quad B Quad C Quad D Mean
    (%)
S1$^{\ast}$ $ \cdots\hfil $ $ \cdots\hfil $ $ \cdots\hfil $ $ \cdots\hfil $ $ \cdots\hfil $ $ \cdots\hfil $
S3 0 5.667 5.579 5.148 5.678 5.518
  1 0.000 0.070 0.071 0.000 0.035
  2 8.000 9.275 9.944 8.754 8.993
  3 2.917 3.138 2.186 2.839 2.770
  4 2.250 2.650 2.680 2.050 2.408
  5 5.250 4.393 4.443 5.836 4.981
  6 14.250 11.018 13.329 12.145 12.685
  7 61.667 63.877 62.200 62.697 62.610
  157 66.917 68.340 66.714 68.533 67.626
  B255 4.333 3.835 4.020 4.180 4.092
$^{\dagger}$ All event grades except B255 are ASCA grades. Here B255 stands for ACIS bit grade code 255 (i.e., all pixels above threshold).
$^{\ast}$ See note for detector S1 in Table 4.70.

nextuppreviouscontents
Next:Predicted On-orbit Background Rates Up:Instrumental Background Previous:Background Rate Measurements at
Please address comments and questions to Dr. John Nousek ( nousek@astro.psu.edu )