|
Frames were processed for events by the ACIS electronics using the standard event thresholds for front-illuminated (38 ADU) and back-illuminated (20 ADU) ACIS detectors, along with the standard split threshold of 13 ADU. The exposure time per frame was 3.34 s. Light curves were then plotted showing the number of counts per frame vs. frame number. Periods of time when the gate valve was open were easily identified by the abrupt increase in the number of counts per frame. The range of frame numbers contaminated by X-rays were noted and all events in these frames were removed from the event lists. The events in each list were then sorted into spectra by detector quadrant and event grade.
For each detector, we combined the spectra from all the science runs
to increase the signal-to-noise. The total exposure time thus obtained
was
ks for each imaging array detector, and
ks for each spectroscopy array detector. Detectors S2 and S3 are in both
arrays and so had total exposures of
ks each. To further improve the statistics, we combined the spectra from
all eight front-illuminated (FI) flight CCDs. Unfortunately, we could not
do the same for the back-illuminated detectors. The ACIS focal plane operating
temperature at XRCF was
;
this is
warmer than the designed operating temperature. Consequently, the background
data taken at XRCF with detector S1 were contaminated by an increase in
the number of hot pixels and could not be used in the instrumental background
analysis.
Rejection of particle-induced events in the ACIS detectors is accomplished
using event amplitude and event grade selection criteria (i.e., the sum
and distribution of charge in
-pixel
events). The passband of the ACIS detectors folded with the HRMA is
-10
keV, so we rejected all events with total pulse-height amplitudes greater
than 10 keV. This eliminated 19.5% of the 781,015 events accumulated in
the FI detectors and 80.0% of the 26,636 events accumulated in detector
S3. We then applied the standard ASCA G02346 event grade selection criteria
to the data to reject all events with pixel geometries that were inconsistent
with the physical interaction of X-rays in the ACIS detectors (i.e., ASCA
G157 events). The results are presented in Figures 4.103
&
4.104.
Figure 4.103: Background spectra measured at XRCF in the ACIS front-illuminated flight devices. The spectra have been summed over the four quadrants of all eight front-illuminated flight devices. The upper and lower panels show the spectra of the rejected (ASCA grades 157) and the unrejected (ASCA grades 02346) background events, respectively, in the passband 0.1--10~keV. The lower panel shows Mn K-alpha line emission due to scattered X-rays from the internal contamination monitor. The Au L-alpha line is caused by particle-induced fluorescence in the framestore covers.
Figure 4.104: Background spectra measured at XRCF in the ACIS back-illuminated flight device S3. The spectra have been summed over all four quadrants. The upper and lower panels show the rejected (ASCA grades 157) and the unrejected (ASCA grades 02346) background spectra, respectively, in the passband 0.1--10~keV.

The upper panel of Figure 4.103
shows the spectrum from 0.1-10 keV of the background events that were rejected
by the ASCA G02346 selection criteria in the FI detectors. The rejected
background rises abruptly from zero at low energies to a peak of about
at around 0.65 keV, then decays towards higher energies as a power law
with index around -2.2, and finally levels off above 6 keV into a long,
flat tail with amplitude
-
.
Spectrally-integrated background rates are listed in Table 4.71.
The lower panel of the figure shows the spectrum of the background events
in the FI detectors that were not rejected by the event grading scheme.
These unrejected background events masquerade as true X-ray events. The
spectrum of the unrejected background appears essentially flat from 0.1-10
keV, with the exception of two emission lines. The Mn K
line at 5.894 keV is due to scattered X-rays from the internal contamination
monitor (ICM), while the Au L
line at 9.671 keV is caused by particle-induced fluorescence in the detector
framestore covers.
The spectrum of the rejected background events in detector S3 is shown in the upper panel of Figure 4.104. The spectrum suffers from low counting statistics, but a small peak can be seen around 0.4 keV; the spectrum then drops between 1 keV and 4 keV, before rising with energy in a broad hump that peaks around 13 keV.
The lower panel shows that the unrejected background in S3 is also relatively
flat, with the exception of the Au L
line and a apparent excess in the number of counts below 2 keV. Note there
is no sign of an Mn K
line in the spectrum.
To study the spatial distribution of the Mn K
line in the focal plane, we have measured the flux of the line in each
quadrant. The Mn K
line fluxes in each detector are listed in Table 4.70,
along with the fluxes of the Au L
line
and the unrejected continuum background. The last column contains the mean
and RMS deviation of the count rates in the quadrants. The Mn K
rate varies systematically with position on the focal plane. All of the
scattered Mn K
flux is observed in detectors I0 and I1, and the quadrants of I2 and I3
immediately adjacent to I0 and I1, respectively. The collimator and baffling
of the internal contamination monitor was intended to require at least
two reflections for a photon to travel from the source itself to the focal
plane. The diffuse reflectance of the gold-coated surfaces near the detectors
is
sr-1at 6 keV. The (unbaffled) brightness of the ICM source itself
was about
during the June 1997 XRCF measurements. Had the ICM baffling requirement
been met, the observed flux at the focal plane (some 14 cm from the source)
should have been less than
.
The observed rate on I0 and I1 suggests that a subtantial fraction of the
source flux is arriving at the detectors after a single reflection. The
reason for this is not understood. For reference, a diagram showing the
ICM, the focal plane, and the intended ICM beam patterns is presented in
Figure 4.105.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 4.105: Cross-section through the ACIS detector housing showing the internal contamination monitor (ICM) X-ray source, its intended illumination pattern, and the ACIS focal plane. In the drawing the Observatory X-axis is up and the Z axis points to the right. Scattered X-ray flux from the ICM is detected on chips I0 and I1, as well as on high-Z quadrants of chips I2 and I3. The scattering path is unknown. The two dimensions shown are in inches.

The total Mn K
flux in I0 and I1 is about
,
while the estimated continuum flux under the peak (unrejected) is about
.
Thus, the scattered Mn K
photons increased the instrumental background in the
keV spectral band by a factor of
at XRCF. Assuming AXAF is launched in January or February of 1999, about
20 months will have elapsed since the XRCF measurements were made. Given
the 2.7 year half-life of the Fe 55 source in the ICM, the predicted on-orbit
rate for the Mn K
line drop by a factor of about 2/3. Moreover, since the expected amplitude
of the on-orbit continuum exceeds that observed at XRCF by about a factor
of about 50 (see Section 4.10.3
below), the scattered ICM is expected to increase the on-orbit background
by about
in the
keV band.
Returning to Table 4.70, we
see that the Au L
fluxes
and the continuum fluxes are roughly uniform across the focal plane, although
a constant model is formally rejected in each case. The mean Au L
line flux was
in the FI detectors, and
in S3. This ratio is consistent, within the rather large errors, with the
expected relative quantum efficiency of the front- and back-illuminated
detectors at 9.7 keV (see section 4.8.)
Because the effective area of the ACIS/HRMA is so low at the energy of
the Au L
line, researchers observing faint diffuse sources can easily remove this
extra source of background by applying a high-energy cutoff.
The mean background continuum fluxes for ASCA grade G02346 and G157 events are listed in Table 4.71. The errors quoted in the table are the standard deviations of the means. These measurements indicate that the total particle-induced count rate in a frontside device is about 26 times higher than the rate in a backside device, but the rejection efficiency of the frontside device is about 52 times better, so the net result is that the unrejected background rate in a backside device is about twice that of a frontside device.
|