Next: Fitting Methods: BI Device
Up: Absolute Quantum Efficiency of
Previous: Quantum Efficiency Model and
The spatially-averaged relative quantum efficiency measurements described in
section 4.7.2 were used to constrain slab-and-stop model
gate structure parameters for the flight FI devices. For each device, the MIT CSR
relative efficiency measurements at 525 eV, 677 eV, 1740 eV and 2015 eV
were used to fit for three model parameters: the mean silicon gate thickness,
the mean silicon dioxide thickness, and the silicon nitride thickness.
In each case, the reference detector quantum efficiency was modelled using
the slab and stop model parameters derived from the undispersed synchrotron
measurements, as described in section 4.6.1.
Estimates of the errors in the relative quantum efficiency measurements
were derived from the comparison of relative efficiency measurements made
at MIT CSR to those made in Phase I (ACIS flat-field) of the XRCF calibration
(see section 4.7.3.) Thus, at these energies, for
the front-illuminated detectors, we take the standard deviation of the
error in each spatially-averaged relative quantum efficiency measurement
to be 0.6%, independent of energy.
Fitting was performed by minimizing the
statistic.
Best-fit gate-structure model
parameters, along with other adopted model parameters, are listed in Table 4.63. In all cases the fits (which had but one degree of freedom
each!) were statistically acceptable given the adopted measurement errors.
Next: Fitting Methods: BI Device
Up: Absolute Quantum Efficiency of
Previous: Quantum Efficiency Model and
Please address comments and questions to Dr. John Nousek ( nousek@astro.psu.edu )