


Next:Warnings
Up:ACIS
High Speed Tap
Previous:Data
Processing
Results
The absolute flux at the ACIS filter in photons per second per centimeter
squared is shown in Table 4.34.
The statistical error of the flux rates presented is generally 0.1 percent,
with a worse case of 0.5 percent.
Table 4.34: Estimated High Speed Tap Flux at ACIS Focal
Plane Corrected for Pileup, Filter Efficiency, and CCD Efficiency in photons
per second per centimeter squared in the line.
| Science Runs |
Energy |
i0 |
i1 |
i2 |
i3 |
s0 |
s1 |
s2 |
s3 |
s4 |
s5 |
| 70 71 |
525 |
18.1 |
18.3 |
18.2 |
17.3 |
18.6 |
26.2 |
18.9 |
24.6 |
18.1 |
18.0 |
| 88 89 |
705 |
23.7 |
23.3 |
23.5 |
23.8 |
23.6 |
40.0 |
24.4 |
39.9 |
25.7 |
23.8 |
| 111 112 |
1487 |
171.7 |
171.7 |
172.2 |
172.4 |
171.7 |
172.7 |
172.5 |
174.5 |
173.1 |
172.4 |
| 72 75 |
1740 |
39.5 |
39.6 |
39.8 |
39.7 |
39.6 |
41.4 |
39.5 |
41.7 |
39.6 |
39.3 |
| 107 108 |
2166 |
73.2 |
73.6 |
73.8 |
73.6 |
73.2 |
76.3 |
74.4 |
78.9 |
73.6 |
74.3 |
| 120 122 123 |
4509 |
64.7 |
66.0 |
65.0 |
65.9 |
76.8 |
68.6 |
74.0 |
75.1 |
70.8 |
69.3 |
| 77 78 83 84 |
6399 |
78.3 |
79.1 |
79.5 |
79.4 |
79.5 |
73.4 |
79.0 |
76.1 |
78.8 |
78.5 |
| 92 93 |
8040 |
242.9 |
244.4 |
240.4 |
245.7 |
254.1 |
230.9 |
246.4 |
233.2 |
243.4 |
247.8 |
|
The relative efficiencies of the ACIS flight devices compared to s2
are shown in Table 4.35.
Table 4.35: High Speed Tap Based Quantum Efficiencies Relative
to the s2 Detector
| Science Runs |
Energy |
i0 |
i1 |
i2 |
i3 |
s0 |
s1 |
s2 |
s3 |
s4 |
s5 |
| 70 71 |
525 |
0.755 |
0.805 |
0.825 |
0.887 |
0.922 |
3.311 |
1.000 |
3.216 |
0.843 |
0.807 |
| 88 89 |
705 |
0.559 |
0.867 |
0.684 |
0.652 |
0.851 |
3.193 |
1.000 |
3.173 |
0.914 |
0.854 |
| 111 112 |
1487 |
0.967 |
0.949 |
0.962 |
0.972 |
0.978 |
1.076 |
1.000 |
1.161 |
0.984 |
0.975 |
| 72 75 |
1740 |
0.965 |
0.967 |
0.976 |
0.971 |
0.948 |
0.672 |
1.000 |
1.042 |
0.956 |
0.943 |
| 107 108 |
2166 |
0.944 |
0.957 |
0.970 |
0.958 |
0.964 |
1.282 |
1.000 |
1.328 |
0.975 |
0.964 |
| 120 122 123 |
4509 |
1.002 |
1.007 |
0.995 |
0.999 |
0.998 |
0.843 |
1.000 |
0.969 |
1.003 |
0.994 |
| 77 78 83 84 |
6399 |
0.949 |
0.950 |
0.957 |
0.954 |
0.951 |
0.604 |
1.000 |
0.750 |
0.992 |
0.976 |
| 92 93 |
8040 |
0.901 |
0.906 |
0.891 |
0.911 |
0.936 |
0.489 |
1.000 |
0.638 |
0.990 |
0.976 |
|
The ratio of ACIS counts to SSD 5 counts is shown in Table 4.36.
The SSD 5 count rates used are from "flux_d3" column of ftp://es81-server1.msfc.nasa.gov/xrayastronomy/QE_energy_total.rdb,
which was last updated August 13, 1997.
Table 4.36: ACIS Count Rate Divided by SSD 5 Count Rate
| Science Runs |
Energy |
i0 |
i1 |
i2 |
i3 |
s0 |
s1 |
s2 |
s3 |
s4 |
s5 |
| 70 71 |
525 |
3.621 |
3.862 |
3.960 |
4.256 |
4.422 |
15.887 |
4.798 |
15.430 |
4.044 |
3.870 |
| 88 89 |
705 |
0.790 |
1.224 |
0.966 |
0.921 |
1.201 |
4.508 |
1.412 |
4.479 |
1.290 |
1.205 |
| 111 112 |
1487 |
0.977 |
0.958 |
0.972 |
0.982 |
0.988 |
1.087 |
1.010 |
1.173 |
0.994 |
0.985 |
| 72 75 |
1740 |
1.156 |
1.158 |
1.169 |
1.163 |
1.135 |
0.805 |
1.198 |
1.249 |
1.145 |
1.129 |
| 107 108 |
2166 |
0.782 |
0.793 |
0.804 |
0.794 |
0.799 |
1.063 |
0.829 |
1.100 |
0.808 |
0.799 |
| 120 122 123 |
4509 |
0.785 |
0.789 |
0.780 |
0.783 |
0.782 |
0.661 |
0.784 |
0.760 |
0.787 |
0.780 |
| 77 78 83 84 |
6399 |
0.792 |
0.793 |
0.799 |
0.796 |
0.793 |
0.504 |
0.834 |
0.626 |
0.828 |
0.815 |
| 92 93 |
8040 |
0.617 |
0.620 |
0.610 |
0.624 |
0.641 |
0.335 |
0.685 |
0.437 |
0.678 |
0.668 |
|



Next:Warnings
Up:ACIS
High Speed Tap
Previous:Data
Processing
Please address comments and questions to Dr. John Nousek ( nousek@astro.psu.edu
)